> What argument are you trying to make for VR? That VR can provide a certain amount of immersive escape from the day to day. Just as the internet replaced cert

> What argument are you trying to make for VR? That VR can provide a certain amount of immersive escape from the day to day. Just as the internet replaced certain offline activities and moved them online, I don't understand VR hasn't done the same. Having used the Quest 2(?) which has automatic boundary detection and cameras that show you the surroundings if you step beyond those boundaries, I no longer had the worry of bumping into things. That made the experience very immersive. So for me personally, there has been a definite improvement in the experience. And I agree, the equipment is currently too cumbersome for the general consumer market. In addition to that, stupid vender-lock ideas such as with the Quest where you need a facebook account to use the device, also prevent the general application of the technology. (I would have bought myself a Quest if Facebook account wasn't a requirement. Vision Pro is simply too expensive.) That doesn't mean that the technology won't one day find general application. Also content does exist, sites such SketchFab have much free 3D content and with WebGL being generally compatiable with VR tech, it's relative easy to generate more content. Yeck, I even worked on some code to make programming in 3D possible![1] > What use case, that would make VR "huge", are you suggesting? I assume you mean general consumer use-casae, there are definitely a number of use cases that are very niche. But if I knew that, I most certainly won't share it with a public forum! ;) [1]=https://flowhub.org/f/5f0c36ed4bd03058 https://flowhub.org/f/5f0c36ed4bd03058