4 ms·
> Maybe Ruby isn't used for accessible web development. What an unnecessary comment. Sure, the docs website could use more work, but what does the choice of a
by pilaf 2y ago
> Maybe Ruby isn't used for accessible web development.
What an unnecessary comment. Sure, the docs website could use more work, but what does the choice of a language used for back-end development have to do with the quality of the front-end code (non-Ruby) in those same projects?
- bachmeier 2y ago> What an unnecessary comment. It's 2024. Accessibility is absolutely worthy of comment, particularly if you're boasting about being a language used for web development. They could have used one of the thousands of available existing solutions rather than rolling their own. > a language used for back-end development have to do with the quality of the front-end code (non-Ruby) Ruby is used for a more than the back-end. Check out Sinatra or Rails.
- paradox460 2y agoSinatra and rails both run on the backend