4 ms·
> Why stop there? By your logic, the owners of every ISP that provides a pathway for those criminal bits also should be in jail. No, that is by your own logic,
by Kbelicius 2y ago
> Why stop there? By your logic, the owners of every ISP that provides a pathway for those criminal bits also should be in jail.
No, that is by your own logic, not GPs. GP clearly said: "You can't just provide a service that knowingly provides a platform to criminal activity and do jack shit.". Considering that ISPs do something about that activity, by GPs logic, owners of ISP should not be in jail. Am I worng?
- garrettgarcia 2y agoYes, you are wrong. Let me explain. GP laid out his principle above: "If your app is known to be uses heavily by criminals ranging from Pedo's to drug dealers. You are liable." He doesn't say that doing "jack shit" (not exactly a fleshed out legal term) will remove that liability, as you are suggesting.
- parineum 2y agoTelegram, an app known to be used for illegal activity, isn't blocked by French ISPs?