These guys are going out of their way to be offended by slopshops using first-gen AI for SEO. This has been happening since ML first got "good" at translating.

These guys are going out of their way to be offended by slopshops using first-gen AI for SEO. This has been happening since ML first got "good" at translating. Just stick to publishers with reputation you agree with. Use search/recommendation engines with user respecting controls. They seem to be calling for blanket rejection of AI assisted content which is more censorship instead of more user preferences. It's going to be interesting when people come out of the woodworks and admit to their much loved works being helped by AI. A lot of people are going to reverse their quality rating based on being "tricked". Same as it ever was with ghost writers and women using pen names. We don't even need AI-free pledges we just need honest reviewers who care about the work and not the meta-data of the work.