4 ms·
No, but from a quick glance it looks like an alternative to git? There might be value in studying their approach. But any solution I’ll be working on will have
by csomar 2y ago
No, but from a quick glance it looks like an alternative to git? There might be value in studying their approach. But any solution I’ll be working on will have to fully work/integrate with a regular git workflow.
- emporas 2y agoOh, if operating within git boundaries is a requirement, then a different version control system is no good. The claim is, that pijul's merge of code is much better and simpler than git. Merges are idempotent and associative if i remember correctly. It cannot get much better than that.
- csomar 2y agoThe reality is that most people are using git at the moment. I am looking to create a product that I'll be able to market and sell (rather something that I have fun R&Ding), so the git boundary is a requirement.