3 ms·
Is not aviation, space-flight, etc. part of "tech"? While you can always over-do processes, you can also under-do them as well (I don't think I need to list exa
by aragilar 2y ago
Is not aviation, space-flight, etc. part of "tech"? While you can always over-do processes, you can also under-do them as well (I don't think I need to list examples here, just look at the news...). Having the processes also be able to adapt to different needs and requirements is part of having good processes.
- m1keil 2y agoI don't think symantics really matter here. I largely think of "tech" as companies that produce mainly virtual goods in the form of software. Most of these software is largely skins over databases. In most cases, nobody will get hurt if their product will malfunction. This is the vast majority of tech companies today. Exceptions exists. I would take under process any day of the week. From my experience, adding a process is far easier than removing it.
- aragilar 2y agoIf you do "tech" == "software" maybe I'd agree with you no one will get hurt (though the cynical part of me says "did you measure this, or do you want this to be true"), but S(cience)T(echnology)E(ngineering)M(athematics) is a thing, and it's definitely not just software.