3 ms·
[EDIT]: apologies, my reading comprehension needs work. I thought you were referring to the 737 MAX, not the 777 What? Do you have a source for the last one? T
by core_dumped 2y ago
[EDIT]: apologies, my reading comprehension needs work. I thought you were referring to the 737 MAX, not the 777
What? Do you have a source for the last one? That sounds like corporate propaganda.
It’s well understood AND PROVEN that the MCAS system (which was a system borrowed from decades old military code) was at fault for this incident. Saying it was suicide seems incredibly disrespectful to both pilots…
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lion_Air_Flight_610 https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lion_Air_Flight_610
In the article it even states they found the wreckage…
- ak217 2y agoThe flight you linked was a Boeing 737. We are talking about the 777. To date, neither the 777 nor the 787 have had any passenger fatalities from any aircraft engineering flaw. That is a monumental achievement.
- core_dumped 2y agoI guess I misunderstood the comment I was replying to. The parent comment mentions the 737 MAX so I assumed that’s what the commenter was referencing. I have read up on the 777 and yes, I agree it’s incredibly safe statistically (as is the 787). I didn’t realize the commenter was talking about the Malaysia flight either. Apologies to them