3 ms·
Ah very interesting. Thanks for making that distinction! To me, I’m wondering at what critical mass of people should you need to provide a back door to the gove
by vhiremath4 2y ago
Ah very interesting. Thanks for making that distinction! To me, I’m wondering at what critical mass of people should you need to provide a back door to the government? Is it 2? 3? 100? 1000? Are the number of people the right indicator here? Genuinely curious of people’s thoughts. I haven’t though too deeply about this.
- stogot 2y agoYou seem to assume there is a “need” to backdoor the people’s communication. Liberty of the people assumes there is not a need nor a right of the State to do so
- eimrine 2y agoNo that was sarcasm to GP.
- kitkat_new 2y agowho is talking about backdoors? the chats are public
- aa_is_op 2y agoYeah. Basically Telegram is the new dark web, but for people to dumb to understand that it logs everything.
- sega_sai 2y agoThere is no need for backdoor anything, when there are public channels. I do not know the specifics of French case though, so I don't know if their case is about those or some private chats.