4 ms·
We think into language. We do not think in language. The former is a more consistent notion than the latter. More consistent with the evidence, etc. cited. Thi
by nerdfiles 14y ago
We think into language. We do not think in language.
The former is a more consistent notion than the latter. More consistent with the evidence, etc. cited. Thinking 'in' language implies passivity and representation, thinking into language implies evolutionarily novel linguistic production, autonomy of mind, etc.
Please review The Philosophical Foundations of Neuroscience.