Also, smol_str was removed from the comparison because matklad, the author of smol_str, suggests ecow > I’d rather say the opposite: users of those crates shou

Also, smol_str was removed from the comparison because matklad, the author of smol_str, suggests ecow > I’d rather say the opposite: users of those crates should switch to ecow. It is exactly what smol_str would have been, if it were a proper crate with a stable API, rather than an implementation detail of rust-analyzer. > > It’s a drop-in replacement for String, with O(1) clone and SSO, and I believe this is all you need. Other crates either have needlessly restricted API (no mutation), questionable implementation choices, or a bunch of ad hoc traits in the API. https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/117ksvr/ecow_compact_cloneonwrite_vector_and_string/j9eh35d/ https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/117ksvr/ecow_compact_...