4 ms·
if you were serious about coding, you knew C. I think this is fundamentally the same toxic thinking that is still with us today. C offered no actual advantage
by snozolli 2y ago
if you were serious about coding, you knew C.
I think this is fundamentally the same toxic thinking that is still with us today.
C offered no actual advantages over Turbo Pascal for DOS/Windows programming. I'm sure one can come up with platforms or releases that weren't supported by TP, since C was the defacto standard. Regardless, they're fundamentally equivalent.
Meanwhile, Turbo Pascal was blazingly fast compared to C. The C linker in particular used to take forever. Turbo Pascal was seen as a toy language. My AP Computer Science exam results were disregarded by colleges because it was in Pascal.
A few years later, I was a C++ snob and looked down on Visual Basic "macro hackers". Meanwhile, at least one true genius electrical engineer I worked with would rapidly prototype software in VB that would take me weeks to replicate in C++.
There's a weird disdain in software development for approachable, efficient tools that create actual business value.
- mark-r 2y agoPascal with its tight type safety made certain things extra hard, like working with images. C on the other hand let you walk all over it. Pascal was very much my preferred language until I learned C - then I never looked back.