As someone experienced with cameras, we are living in an age where upperclass smartphones look superior to many cinema production cameras on paper. Yet the sma

As someone experienced with cameras, we are living in an age where upperclass smartphones look superior to many cinema production cameras on paper. Yet the smartphone picture still sucks, as it is too compressed, the colors are off, weird post processing is applied that ruins the picture, the sensor may have impressive resolution, but all other specs are not as impressive and of course the lens assembly doesn't even compare due to size constraints. Which in the end leads to a mix where the unprocessed gamma-adjusted picture of the cinema camera will look like the real thing, while the smartphone picture will have its flaws, that will come through or not depending on the source material. As for features, making more use of existing hardware is good. I wouldn't need pixelshift in most cases, but when I would it is there.