3 ms·
In hindsight, I think I mixed up 3.1 and 95 (they’re both before my time). So I guess my actual controversial opinion is that I’m very glad UIs don’t look like
by BalinKing 2y ago
In hindsight, I think I mixed up 3.1 and 95 (they’re both before my time). So I guess my actual controversial opinion is that I’m very glad UIs don’t look like Windows 95 anymore :-P
Of course, all this is a matter of personal preference—I just think that nostalgia plays an underappreciated role in these discussions.
- WarOnPrivacy 2y agoMy 1st was 3.0 (bundled with a Z-Nix mouse). For functionality. I prefer modern control panel over 3.x - and over Settings. 1) Settings has no applets I can pin to the start menu (ex: printers). 2) I can't be in two parts of Settings at the same time. 3) Commonly-used control panel options: In Settings they can be missing, neutered or moved+moved again. 4) Settings still reverts to control panel applets for some functions. Will those options still exist without a control panel? No one knows.