> Actually the 500M (or 400M or 300M) or whatever number is bogus. Could you provide some sources here? > They've probably created a very large Freebase graph

> Actually the 500M (or 400M or 300M) or whatever number is bogus. Could you provide some sources here? > They've probably created a very large Freebase graph for scale testing and it's likely that they're able to handle 500M entities from a hardware perspective. If this were reality it would be a pretty big lie on Google's part. Why do you think this is the case? EDIT: OK, now I realize why your comments trigger my BS alarm. It's in your interest to represent the Google knowledge-graph as being equivalent to Freebase/metaweb (a Google acquisition many years ago. Do you really think they did nothing to increase their graph since that acquisition?) because you are the founder of Ontology2 (the company providing this service). You really should mention that somewhere in this thread or on your profile (I realize your comments elsewhere in this thread allude to it -- for the claims you are making without sources that's not enough IMHO).