3 ms·
> they are different interpretation of what IMGUI means? Yes. Good luck clearing that up. The programming community as a whole couldn't even get Object Oriente
by lylejantzi3rd 2y ago
> they are different interpretation of what IMGUI means?
Yes. Good luck clearing that up. The programming community as a whole couldn't even get Object Oriented Programming right. It originally meant little machines passing messages to each other (Smalltalk, Objective-C). What we got was inheritance, encapsulation, and polymorphism (Java).
- igouy 2y ago> It originally meant "Smalltalk encourages well-factored designs through inheritance. Every class inherits behavior from its superclass … all forms of ordered collections in the system will instantly acquire this new capability through inheritance." "Modularity: No component in a complex system should depend on the internal details of any other component." "Polymorphism: A program should specify only the behavior of objects, not their representation." 1981 "Design Principles Behind Smalltalk" Daniel H. H. Ingalls https://www.cs.virginia.edu/~evans/cs655/readings/smalltalk.html https://www.cs.virginia.edu/~evans/cs655/readings/smalltalk....