This is a stupid arguement. I wish author understood an ounce of how LLMs works. Of course, they know more than whay they say. That's because LLMs are nothing b

This is a stupid arguement. I wish author understood an ounce of how LLMs works. Of course, they know more than whay they say. That's because LLMs are nothing but probabistic structures. They mix and match and provide probabilistic approach. Therefore, they are always making a choice between multiple options. I wish there was a global mandatory course before these substacky authors write for fame.