3 ms·
> that the crimes of the parents are not the crimes of the child Yeah, this is some more idealistic nonsense. Children should obviously not be criminally perse
by brigadier132 2y ago
> that the crimes of the parents are not the crimes of the child
Yeah, this is some more idealistic nonsense. Children should obviously not be criminally persecuted for being the child of evil people but being the child of and raised by terrorists (and other evil people) should automatically disqualify you from certain jobs.
Given Chesa Boudin's actual track record and the fact he was recalled I think history proves my point.
> I think it's kinda funny that you'd make that claim in a thread about policing actual crime.
Why do you think it's funny? Chesa Boudin is directly responsible for the lack of policing due to his refusal to enforce the law as DA. Do you not know why he was recalled?
- JumpCrisscross 2y ago> being the child of and raised by terrorists (and other evil people) should automatically disqualify you from certain jobs Wat.
- brigadier132 2y agoYou think that the children of dictators, mass murderers and terrorists should be allowed to be politicians? Here's a question for you, would you vote for the child of a KKK member?
- 8f2ab37a-ed6c 2y agoHere's a counter-example from the real world: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alessandra_Mussolini https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alessandra_Mussolini
- JumpCrisscross 2y ago> would you vote for the child of a KKK member? Idk. Depends on what they believe. Plenty of kids of Nazis and Confederates became upstanding citizens.
- brendoelfrendo 2y ago> Why do you think it's funny? Because we're talking about policing actual crime and you're talking about punishing people who haven't committed any crime at all. > Given Chesa Boudin's actual track record and the fact he was recalled I think history proves my point. I don't think you can make the "apple doesn't fall far from the tree" argument when the tree is "bank robber" and the apple is "made questionable policy decisions as DA."