4 ms·
Nice job! This is something I would use. However, the pricing plans are not friendly for occasional users. I maybe use it 10 times a year, but the only option i
by vzaliva 2y ago
Nice job! This is something I would use. However, the pricing plans are not friendly for occasional users. I maybe use it 10 times a year, but the only option is a monthly subscription. I wish they also had pay-per-use plans.
This illustrates the annoying trend for software products to insist on monthly subscriptions. I understand that businesses want recurring revenue, but many users would rather pay upfront or per use.
- seattleeng 2y agoI get your point but its $3/mo or $18/yr. If a diagram isnt worth 1.80 to you then you probably wouldnt have bought it even with pay as you go
- sramam 2y agoI have always wondered if projects like this would be better off having a pay-as-you-go-model. One example: - Minimum account balance to start: $10. - $1/use - Then top-off as you need - no balance expiry (outside service going bust)
- seattleeng 2y agoA credit based model with minimum add amounts like that does sound like a great alternative if people prefer usage based pricing. From what Ive seen usage pricing actually drives a lot of anxiety even if the end cost is lower
- jen729w 2y agoAuphonic has this model and I’ve been a happy on/off customer for 10+ years now. (They do audio processing.)