4 ms·
The problem is that the question itself implies belief of a system that many people do not buy into. It's like saying, what type of Christian are you: practisi
by achhat 2y ago
The problem is that the question itself implies belief of a system that many people do not buy into.
It's like saying, what type of Christian are you: practising or non-practising? A question that disregards the fact that many people don't consider that religion to be an accurate model of the world in the first place.
- hungie 2y agoNo, it's different than that. The correct analogy would be, "I'm a practicing Christian, but you don't call yourself that. What would you call the group that doesn't call themselves practicing Christians?" I'm not asking "are you a twink or a bear" I'm asking if you belong to a group that doesn't identify as homosexual. If you think homosexuality is evil, you probably can still acknowledge that some people do identify themselves as homosexual. Your point only exists for an extremely narrow group of people who deny that people identify as trans or homosexual. And for those folks, I'd probably have a separate conversation about, "you might consider it amoral, but you know there are people who call themselves gay, right?"
- nobody9999 2y agoNo. Since you're obviously too stupid to understand what I said in three different ways, I'll cut you a little slack. What do I call people? Steve or Helene or Bobby or Samuel. Because they are individuals and deserve to be treated as such. Fuck off asshole.
- hungie 2y agoI understand that sets can be a difficult concept for some. I'm happy to help you work through some basics (Venn diagrams, etc) if you'd like.