2 ms·

Has there been any movement on "real" browser options (i.e. not just calling the built-in webkit in the backend)? I know there were a boatload of requirements A

Has there been any movement on "real" browser options (i.e. not just calling the built-in webkit in the backend)? I know there were a boatload of requirements Apple gave to do it and I'm out of the loop after that (was it consider a reasonable set, has anyone been trying to apply anyways, etc).

barkerja 2y ago
In the EU, different engines are allowed. If that's what you mean. There is an entitlement specifically for that, see: https://developer.apple.com/support/alternative-browser-engines/ https://developer.apple.com/support/alternative-browser-engi...
- zamadatix 2y ago
  Yeah, that's what a meant. Apple "allowed" them but they tied a boatload of requirements to that and I don't think anyone has actually applied yet.
  - wkat4242 2y ago
    Yeah including a really high cost per download. That will really discourage FOSS efforts :(
    - sebazzz 2y ago
      And can be developed only in Europe too.
      - wkat4242 2y ago
        Oh yeah good point. I forgot about that stipulation. They really try to make it as difficult as possible. I don't think we'll see firefox with gecko on iOS any time soon.
lutoma 2y ago
Mozilla seems to be working on porting Gecko to iOS (I think they're trying to build a new frontend for the stack used in Android Firefox): https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1882872 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1882872