I'm the one making the claim, and it does not attempt to refute the parent post, it agrees with/reinforces it. I'm also making the point that a human with an e

I'm the one making the claim, and it does not attempt to refute the parent post, it agrees with/reinforces it. I'm also making the point that a human with an error rate of x% is not directly comparable to a machine with x% error rate, just via a different line of reasoning.