I take issue with people making suggestions that some company is a monopoly each time a company is found to be mistreating its customers. If one wants to claim

I take issue with people making suggestions that some company is a monopoly each time a company is found to be mistreating its customers. If one wants to claim that some company of a monopoly - they should back it up with more than one signal... such as a dominant position in the market, no substitutes for the products, or lack of concern about other companies entering the market (such as NordicTrack).