3 ms·
It's not a "real" problem unless 7 billion people really need a net positive replacement rate.
by calf 2y ago
It's not a "real" problem unless 7 billion people really need a net positive replacement rate.
- dr-detroit 2y ago[dead]
- sushibowl 2y agoUnfortunately a shrinking population leads to a situation where there are more older people alive than young people, which makes our retirement and health care systems quite unsustainable.
- spacemadness 2y agoI think coupling these ideas together, it’s all rather unsustainable, no? That seems to be the elephant in the room, but everyone is too busy here telling others they’re just “dicking around” not having children. Just kick that can down the road a bit more I guess.
- kurthr 2y agoApparently, the expected population peak with Africa and India is about 10 billion people. My suspicion is that machines replace more and more economic activity within wealthy contracting nations. Humans already cost several $100k in the US once you look at health education and food subsidies. If a machine can pay for itself +ROI, it probably will be built.