4 ms·
That's because those companies are large and public, and the equity they have in the company makes an annual salary unnecessary. I don't see how that applies i
by prospero 18y ago
That's because those companies are large and public, and the equity they have in the company makes an annual salary unnecessary.
I don't see how that applies in this situation.
- wmorein 18y agoIn Jobs's specific case, for a while he held no equity and also drew no salary.