> It would be much healthier if criticisms actually focused on the design and implementation of PPA. Let's start with the fact that they've added their spying

> It would be much healthier if criticisms actually focused on the design and implementation of PPA. Let's start with the fact that they've added their spying as opt out instead of opt in because they know that if people were asked they would not consent to it. They're already disrespecting users by trying to slip this unwanted thing into their browser largely unnoticed. There is no way to exploit and manipulate people that is safe and private. A browser is a user-agent. It's supposed to be working for you, the user. Not for advertisers who will try to manipulate you and take your money. Mozilla is not working to protect your privacy and security. They are trying to come up with a scheme that will trick users who object to ads and reject surveillance capitalism into accepting them along with the violations of privacy and security they depend on. There is nothing "noble" about this. This is just about making money at your expense. It's the exact same goal every other ad-tech company has.