> given the absolutely staggering number of MIT licensed repos under github.com/Microsoft I don't know that such a thing would be as bad as you envision Well t

> given the absolutely staggering number of MIT licensed repos under github.com/Microsoft I don't know that such a thing would be as bad as you envision Well they keep their main stuff carefully closed. Github isn't open source for example:) And simply think would they pay Github the money they paid (or any money at all) if it was open source like Gitlab? I guess if you say it's public and autonomous I wouldn't mind if Gitlab bought Sourcegraph. If MS did it I would mind a ton