3 ms·
With pretty much same requirements, I settled in the Casio LCW-M100TSE-1AER. Very simple, totally autonomous, no need to adjust time even… Better would be a Se
by f1shy 2y ago
With pretty much same requirements, I settled in the Casio LCW-M100TSE-1AER.
Very simple, totally autonomous, no need to adjust time even…
Better would be a Seiko with GPS, but too expensive.
- rayxi271828 2y agoExactly... add to that the requirement that I want to have the peace of mind of being able to accidentally bang the watch against the metal poles of the subway, etc., without damaging it in some ways, and I always end up with a G-Shock.
- RachelF 2y agoFor a digital-only lightweight alternative that does everything a watch should do, the Casio F-E10 is ideal.
- flacebo 2y agoI wouldn't consider that an alternative to a solar radio watch.
- darkFunction 2y agoI also wear this watch every day and have done for a couple of years now. It’s the perfect watch- completely autonomous time, solar powered, classic look while still having digital functions. I love not having to worry about ever setting the time or changing the battery. And it’s waterproof! The sapphire glass means I don’t treat it especially well and it looks brand new.
- mhandley 2y agoI have exactly the same watch for exactly the same reasons. With saphire glass and a titanium case and strap, it's very light and after two years of being worn constantly, it's still completely unmarked. It's also nicely inconspicuous - it's "just a casio", but those who know, know.
- bux93 2y agoIt also has a more complicated (chronograph) brother, the LIW-M610. It's fun to see the hands in the subdials spin around as you change functions and timezones.
- epse 2y agoThe rather mild water resistance on that model always has me doubting..
- mhandley 2y agoUnless you're a diver, it should be OK. I've never taken mine off for swimming or sailing and not had a problem in two years.
- eleveriven 2y agoThe Casio LCW-M100TSE-1AER is a solid choice!