3 ms·
This is a good example. They wrote: “When confronted (constructively, much later) they usually get evasive and can’t explain.” Confronted is a big word with a
by hluska 2y ago
This is a good example. They wrote:
“When confronted (constructively, much later) they usually get evasive and can’t explain.”
Confronted is a big word with a hostile intent. They’re incredibly measured in their language and use precise language. That sounds like a trap to me - it’s:
A.) Asking three questions and only get 1/3 answered.
B.) Waiting for a suitable period of time to elapse.
C.) Confronting them while expecting an explanation.
Letting time go by, “confronting them” and expecting an explanation is a trap. It assumes that they can even remember the conversation! Why not send a follow up email immediately and politely ask again? Heck, that’s a good excuse to use “circle back” in conversation. :)
If you missed that first read, no worries because so did I. I had to read the comment three times and then I kind of shaked my head because they are so measured and precise, and that’s an awfully big statement to make about colleagues.
- wruza 2y agoIt was just a poor choice of word. Should have said “asked them about”.
- creesch 2y agoI feel like you are reading way to much into it. To the point that this is almost appropriate https://ludic.mataroa.blog/blog/the-violent-role-of-relentless-positivity-in-the-workplace/ https://ludic.mataroa.blog/blog/the-violent-role-of-relentle... Confronted isn't necessarily a hostile word. It is a very apt word to use for the action off asking someone about the other two points. They even made it clear that it was in a constructive manner. May I ask, do you often feel like you are operating in a hostile environment?