3 ms·
MJ has always been this pixar-style-hyperfit SD variant. It almost seemed to just repeat google images but with gloss. Or at least a year ago it was like that
by resource_waste 2y ago
MJ has always been this pixar-style-hyperfit SD variant. It almost seemed to just repeat google images but with gloss.
Or at least a year ago it was like that.
- mdp2021 2y agoFor a period I daily checked its best outputs page: the "pixar" style was frequent, but far from being the only one. "Typical" like 10 is the type (mode) in 10+9+9+8+8+7+7+6+6+5+5+4+4+3+3+2+2+1+1 - but still 10% of the whole and just one possibility of all. Midlibrary.io recognizes 5500 styles Midjourney knows.
- furyofantares 2y agoHere's a project I did over a year ago in Midjourney where I took all art for the card game Spectromancer and re-themed each piece in 26 different styles https://kellydornhaus.github.io/Variations/ https://kellydornhaus.github.io/Variations/
- paretoer 2y agoThat is the base style. You can get much different image qualities adding different types of film, cameras, etc to the prompt. With that said, I loved Midjourney a year ago but I am at the point I have seen enough AI art to last several lives. AI art reminds me of eating wasabi. It is absolutely amazing at first but I quickly get totally sick of it.