> procedural methods written by humans I did not understand what you intended here, but I see what you mean. I totally agree that these are the algorithms to b

> procedural methods written by humans I did not understand what you intended here, but I see what you mean. I totally agree that these are the algorithms to beat. I'd argue that procedural methods should also include human writing processes, which to date have produced the best output. I assume the technology will get there eventually.