3 ms·
> Yes, let's just focus on small stuff we already do No, you don't > automated cars with less human error. The comment you replied to already noted that this
by oneplane 2y ago
> Yes, let's just focus on small stuff we already do
No, you don't
> automated cars with less human error.
The comment you replied to already noted that this has no effect on existing cars, of which many magnitudes more exist than automated cars (those do not exist on the road, not to the degree that is proposed).
> Sometimes I can't even on this website with supposedly some of the smartest folks.
Oh, the irony.
- Wissenschafter 2y ago>Oh, the irony. Yes, quite funny. The claim is absurd. Cars communicating with each other is feasible even for older vehicles.
- idiotsecant 2y agoVery interested in how you would suppose this works.
- Diti 2y agoWild guess, but probably with a transponder: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transponder https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transponder
- Wissenschafter 2y agoEvery driver has a cellphone in their pocket, I'm sure it's more than possible to integrate people with modern vehicles in a mesh net to older vehicles by using an app or something. It's not hard to think about, c'mon now. What website am I on ffs?
- nuancebydefault 2y agoThe problem is reliability. The cellphone is not constantly connected to a network, depending on its location, battery, age of electronics, software updates,... You would need a system that works with a mesh with holes. Not much better than today's situation i would guess.