worth the bother. "preview" on the capitalocenic web without any mention of the Link Relation Types does not a semantic web adoption make. no mention of the eco

worth the bother. "preview" on the capitalocenic web without any mention of the Link Relation Types does not a semantic web adoption make. no mention of the economic analysis and impact of monopoly, no intersectional analysis with #a11y. if the "preview" link relation type is worth mentioning it's worth substantiating the claims about adoption. when did the big players adopt? why? what of the rest of the types and their relation to would-be "a.i." claims? how would we write html differently and what capabilities would we expose more readily to driving by links, like carousels only if written with a11y in mind? how would our world-wild web look different if we wrote html like we know it? than only give big players a pass when we view source?