4 ms·
All just because he once signed up for a Disney+ trial.
by TomK32 2y ago
All just because he once signed up for a Disney+ trial.
- carlmr 2y agoI really like how in German law anything that could be regarded as surprising in a ToS is just thrown out.
- TomK32 2y agoI'm pretty sure you can also find that in some EU regulation.
- carlmr 2y agoYes, Germany introduced them in 1976 and the EU based their regulation (Directive 93/13) on it in 1993.
- immibis 2y agoNot a universal principle in Germany though. Today I was awoken by government thugs breaking into my room and telling me that even though I paid my rent, someone else didn't pay theirs so I'm homeless now (collective punishment). If only I was joking. I refused to leave, so they called more government thugs (i.e. the police) to help them drag me out, but the police told them they have to give people three weeks notice before making them homeless so fuck off.
- carlmr 2y agoI'm sorry to hear that. Was this part of your rental agreement? If so WTF? If not what was the reasoning?
- jerf 2y agoNominally that is the case in US law too. Contracts can not have "unconscionable" clauses in them, and certainly a free trial for a streaming service that you never even paid for several years ago affecting an interaction with an amusement park is insane. But common law (a term of art, not just an adjective stuck to a noun) has a lot of inconvenient principles in it that limit the power of the government, and as the rule of man progresses in the US, this becomes increasingly hypothetical.