3 ms·
> So, it's a 2 GW power link, not a 20 GW power link Yup, my bad. Title is wrong but I can't change it now. I was looking for quick figures and saw the solar c
by wmstack 2y ago
> So, it's a 2 GW power link, not a 20 GW power link
Yup, my bad. Title is wrong but I can't change it now. I was looking for quick figures and saw the solar capacity numbers and put them. It seems only about 1.75 GW are actually planned to go through that link.
- MaKey 2y agoMaybe @dang can help with the title
- dang 2y agoHappy to, but can someone suggest what a better (i.e. more accurate and neutral) title would be? p.s. @dang doesn't work, which is why I didn't respond to this sooner. For guaranteed message delivery, you (or someone) need to email hn@ycombinator.com.