3 ms·
yay you know we’re going to have this Supreme Court’s law of the land for the next 50 years, instead of focusing on what’s impractical for you have you conside
by yieldcrv 2y ago
yay
you know we’re going to have this Supreme Court’s law of the land for the next 50 years, instead of focusing on what’s impractical for you have you considered shaping the country in ways that are practical?
Genuinely curious because thats what I don’t get about the SCOTUS dismay crowd. Isn't there some agency out there you hate? Some regulation thats set you back? Go after that one. Focus on what you can control instead of what you cant.
- skhunted 2y agoIt has always been the case that an agency rule or regulation could be challenged in the courts. There are lots of examples prior to the recent Chevron ruling of courts striking down agency rules. What’s going to happen is that companies are going to pollute a lot more with impunity. It will be a wild west sort of situation. Our quest to become Ferenginar is well on its way.
- yieldcrv 2y agoThere’s more to the concept of regulation than just the EPA or anything related to the environment A huge component of why I can’t take this “agency delegated” view seriously is because the people preferring it seemingly have no perception of just how much other agencies do, often in a protectionist way to an incumbent thats totally captured that agency. How difficult it was to get standing to even take an agency to court to alter it. This adds color to my view: instead of focusing on what’s impractical for you, considered shaping the country in ways that are practical for you