4 ms·
Obviously that wasn't the question, but you know that's what it's over. A bit naive to think we'd all love to have these nice things if only we can do them in a
by fumeux_fume 2y ago
Obviously that wasn't the question, but you know that's what it's over. A bit naive to think we'd all love to have these nice things if only we can do them in a procedurally correct manner.
- nine_k 2y agoCareful with this logic. It leads all the way to the idea of a "good king" who'd quickly bring in nice things, unencumbered by any procedures. Or to just picking good things from store shelves and skipping the procedurally correct checkout and payment. Procedures are imperfect. But they were introduced to keep away worse imperfections. FTR, I do think that unpaid non-competes should be considered null and void. I also want this to be codified properly, so that no judge would have grounds to proclaim it frivolous and revoke.