4 ms·
No, it's a triple-negative. Judge struck down (1) ban (2) on non-(3) competes. As a result of this ruling, non-competes are now enforceable; workers are not al
by GeneralMayhem 2y ago
No, it's a triple-negative. Judge struck down (1) ban (2) on non-(3) competes.
As a result of this ruling, non-competes are now enforceable; workers are not allowed to compete with ex-employers.
- onlyrealcuzzo 2y agoOn the Federal level. If you live in a state that banned non-competes (California, Illinois, etc), your employer can try to sue you, but it won't go anywhere.
- toomuchtodo 2y agohttps://eig.org/state-noncompete-map/ https://eig.org/state-noncompete-map/ Most surprising: Oklahoma and North Dakota have full bans. TIL.