This comment is misleading; the youtube video contains these animations but "the fucking article" does not. Please, if you're going to imply criticism that the

This comment is misleading; the youtube video contains these animations but "the fucking article" does not. Please, if you're going to imply criticism that the article went unread, don't mention things that are instead in a video. The url attached to this post is to an article (a transcript), not to https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-16RFXr44fY https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-16RFXr44fY which contains the content you're talking about. Instead, please consider helpfully linking to the animations[1] you're talking about, so that others can find them without having to waste time listening to content they already read. 1: https://youtu.be/-16RFXr44fY?t=185 https://youtu.be/-16RFXr44fY?t=185