3 ms·
> If advice/coaching becomes 10x better through technology (big "if" haha), am I equipped to accept and enact it? This is what I am arguing though. Even if it
by from-nibly 2y ago
> If advice/coaching becomes 10x better through technology (big "if" haha), am I equipped to accept and enact it?
This is what I am arguing though. Even if it was a million times better it wouldnt matter. Advice is inherently useless. Making it better doesn't help. Purifying water more doesn't make it better at conducting electricity because water doesn't conduct electricity. And the fact that water can conduct electricity is because, accidentally, it might have other compounds in it that do conduct electricity.
The thing we need to focus on is figuring out how to obtain and apply truth. We already have access to enough truth to keep us busy for lifetimes. Its not going to be a technological solution and its not transferrable to other people ( see everything as theory building).
- surprisetalk 2y agoAh, thanks for the clarification. To me, "advice" seems like an attempt to propagate truth and truth-seeking tools. I'm not very good with semantics though. Either way, if people (or machines) want to try and get such truths through my bone-brain barrier, I'm all for it :)