3 ms·
Same as the rest of the ML family then.
by mananaysiempre 2y ago
Same as the rest of the ML family then.
- bunderbunder 2y agoSame as the rest of the functional languages, even.
- mananaysiempre 2y agoMy first functional language was Haskell, which essentially only has a letrec, so afterwards I’ve always viewed everybody else’s approach as a bit peculiar :) Fair point that it’s the Lisp way too.
- mjaniczek 2y agoNah, Elm doesn't need the rec keyword and could be argued to be a ML descendant