> for whatever definition of better you see fit IMO the important sense of "better" will be good integrations - making various ML-based tools convenient and co

> for whatever definition of better you see fit IMO the important sense of "better" will be good integrations - making various ML-based tools convenient and common to use as part of a workflow. We're all biased towards morally justifying what we're already doing. Those against AI still tend to use tools like Google Translate (trained on translators' work, partially displacing their jobs) and when asked will often give reasons why it's different and other AI tools are worse; ultimately I think that's ad-hoc rationale downstream from the fact they were already using Google Translate (because it's useful and baked into their browser) rather than it being reasoning that they actually used to determine whether to use Google Translate and which would need addressing for other ML tools to become accepted. If someone starts using, say initially, ML-based background removal and upscaling as part of their workflow (because it's demonstrably useful and easily accessible in their editor), I think they'd equally start justifying that.