Again, you are being disingenuous. Whether it materially impacts children is not a fact but a judgment. The code is designed such that it is nearly impossible

Again, you are being disingenuous. Whether it materially impacts children is not a fact but a judgment. The code is designed such that it is nearly impossible to say anything other than “it may impact children”. Websites are effectively forced to write a document that says “be believe that our site may negatively impact children”. Now, what are the odds that a future politically-motivated DA won’t “accidentally” leak that “secret document which admits they knew they were harming children” when they want to go after someone for something unrelated?