> Which people? If we universally did that as a default, elections would look massively different. All people, otherwise we wouldn't be able to do basic tasks,

> Which people? If we universally did that as a default, elections would look massively different. All people, otherwise we wouldn't be able to do basic tasks, such as finding edible food or recognise danger. I dislike how you discount the way other people vote as being somehow irrational, while I'm sure you consider your own political thinking as being rational. People always vote according to their own needs and self-interest, and in terms of politics, things are always nuanced and complicated. The fact that many people vote contrary to your wishes is actually proof that people can think for themselves. > Getting good answers for coding questions on my private code/databases disproves this. I use GitHub Copilot and ChatGPT every day. It only answers correctly when there's a clear, and widely documented pattern, and even then, it can hallucinate. Don't get me wrong, it's still useful, but it shows in no way an ability to reason, or the capacity to admit that a solution is out of its reach. Your experience with coding is kind of irrelevant to the question at hand.