No idea why this got down voted. git is very much a blockchain - sequential list of changes to a data source (commits) - single, shared history of changes (m

No idea why this got down voted. git is very much a blockchain - sequential list of changes to a data source (commits) - single, shared history of changes (main branch) - users creating potential next change(s) to be added to the history (side branches and forks) - consensus mechanism for new change blocks (merge requests and code reviews or approvals) What's missing?