Don't understand. How does doing real world experiments to test your hypothesis not help with the very common problem of being wrong? > It's not the way scien

Don't understand. How does doing real world experiments to test your hypothesis not help with the very common problem of being wrong? > It's not the way science is done any way. That's a very sweeping statement - especially since the scientific method is quite a catch-all phrase. In the end science is driven forward by new data, gathered either intentionally or incidentally. Self-driving cars can continue to learn because they are continually generating more data. Advertising algorithms can continue to learn and adapt as the campaigns they create are in effect experiments - and some are even well designed. I suppose large language models can continue to learn by chatting to humans - but they are potentially only learning how to please humans, not necessarily underlying truths.