> But not finding failures during testing maybe means you’re not testing hard enough. This is not quite the same. This is finding a failed part that should not

> But not finding failures during testing maybe means you’re not testing hard enough. This is not quite the same. This is finding a failed part that should not have failed, as it should have been designed to -at least- pass the flight test requirements it was designed to fulfil. And what this article failed to mention was that similar structural issues were found on 2 other test aircrafts.