2 ms·
Google's action is to declare its identity. The website operator can do with that identity as they wish. They could block it, accept it, accept it but only on
by paulddraper 2y ago
Google's action is to declare its identity.
The website operator can do with that identity as they wish.
They could block it, accept it, accept it but only on Tuesday afternoon.
---
"Anticompetitive" would be some action by Google to suppress competitors. Offering identification is not that.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- arrosenberg 2y agoRegardless of whether Google has broken the law, the arrangement is clearly anticompetitive. It is not dissimilar to owning the telephone or power wires 100 years ago. Building operators were not willing to install redundant connections for the same service for each operator, and webmasters are not willing to allow unlimited numbers of crawlers on their sites. If we continue to believe in competitive and robust markets, we can't allow a monopolistic corporation to act as a private regulator of a key service that powers the modern economy. The law may need more time to catch up, but search indexing will eventually be made a utility.