4 ms·

[flagged]

• CRConrad 2y ago
  1) You've got your chronology and causality wrong[1]. No, I did not "stalk [your] other comment threads" after my other response to you. 2) And no, pointing out flawed logic in an argument is not a "personal attack". 3) My interests and motivations don't affect the validity of my arguments. I just said that assertions aren't proofs (here), and that working for a particular employer is a choice, not mandatory (elsewhere, at your link above). Hitler could say either of those, and it would still be correct. So could Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, Emperor Bokassa, Donald Trump, Joe Biden, or Churchill. See how it has nothing to do with ideology? 4) What you claim are "proofs" are still just assertions, and working for a particular employer is still a choice. You were wrong, that is all. ___ [1]: I think I've replied to you exactly twice before, and you posted this exact same (apart from the link) response to both. Since what you're saying is either "you attacked me elsewhere, and then followed me here!" or "you attacked me here, and then followed me elsewhere!", it's confusing as Hell. Which is supposed to be "elsewhere", and which "here"? It even took me a while to realise both links were valid, and not some weird loop... (I was beginning to speculate whether Dan G had moved one sub-thread or both into some offshoot. That is, after I realised they are two separate sub-threads in the first place.)