22 ms·
While this is cool, it is neither new or good. The result looks great, no paint used! Must be ok? To me it would still seem there was a cost of cleanup, there
by mparlane 14y ago
While this is cool, it is neither new or good.
The result looks great, no paint used! Must be ok?
To me it would still seem there was a cost of cleanup, therefore damage has been done. For the council to remove the graffiti they would have to clean the surronding pavement.
edit: I knew this would be downvoted, but my personal opinion still stands. This is not free to cleanup... Chalk is easier[to cleanup], chalk disapears with rain.
- ricardobeat 14y agoEncouraging public services to clean up the streets isn't damage in my book. http://www.wired.com/underwire/2007/10/dirty-trick-cau/ http://www.wired.com/underwire/2007/10/dirty-trick-cau/
- avree 14y agoPublic services weren't leaving the streets dirty because they were lazy, they were leaving the streets dirty because they were rationing water due to drought...