I don't think we're using the same definition of invasive. To me, invasive would be a solution that compromises the privacy of the child or parents or both. Ap

I don't think we're using the same definition of invasive. To me, invasive would be a solution that compromises the privacy of the child or parents or both. Apple's work on driver's licenses comes to mind. The deep integration is exactly what allows such a feature to not be invasive. Limits on what "School Mode" can actually do and the actual implementation approach will determine whether or not such a feature is invasive. It certainly could be implemented in an invasive way. But being invasive is not intrinsic to such a solution. And keep in mind the alternative is an outright ban, which in terms of absolute outcomes is far more "invasive" to individual carrying devices if you're using a definition of the word that covers "limits access to your device when on school premises".